![]() Yes, this information has been frequently reinforced and reiterated on other sources that discuss the applications of gene therapy in regard to treating cancer.such as.(if you want) Therefore, this source is very reliable as it has been created by a credible author with a lot of expertise in this area of research, and the information provided is consistent with a lot of other sources on the topic of using gene therapy to treat cancer. Has the information from the source been consistently reinforced in other sources that you have viewed? E.g. National Institutes of Health's National Library of Medicine and is on a government website, which further enhances its credibility. ![]() The source itself was published by the U.S. He currently works as an oncologist in North Warren, PA, USA. Amer, is a highly qualified medical professional who specialises in hematology and oncology and has over 21 years of experience in his field. Hey, nickclarke! (This is the source I'll use to show you some examples of analysing secondary data: ) When assessing the reliability of data from a secondary source, you want to answer 2 main questions (plus 1 bonus one): - What is the credibility of the source? (Who wrote the information? Do they have the authority or expertise in this area?) E.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |